A Los Angeles jury has ruled that Meta and Google are liable in a lawsuit over social media addiction, a landmark decision that could have monumental repercussions in how future similar cases are handled across the United States, and possibly beyond. The case centered on a 20-year-old woman known in court as Kaley, who said she became dependent on Instagram and YouTube after starting to use them in childhood.
Jurors found that both companies acted negligently and failed to warn users about potential harms linked to prolonged use of their platforms. They also agreed that design elements such as recommendation systems, notifications, and auto-play contributed to her mental health struggles.
Social media addiction
Kaley reportedly described experiencing body dysmorphia, depression, and suicidal thoughts after years of near-constant app use. Her legal team argued that these platforms were built in ways that encouraged compulsive engagement, making it difficult for younger users to step away.
After extended deliberations, the jury awarded $3 million in damages and supported additional punitive damages. Responsibility was divided, with Meta assigned the larger share.
SEE ALSO: A new lawsuit against Meta questions whether WhatsApp messages are encrypted
Lawyers for the two tech giants pushed back, naturally, arguing that her mental health issues were tied to personal circumstances rather than time spent on social media. They also questioned the idea of social media addiction as a defined medical condition.
The trial is one of several underway that focus on how platforms are built, rather than what users post, an approach meant to sidestep legal protections under Section 230. That strategy is now being tested in courts as more lawsuits from parents, school districts, and state officials move forward.
Some of these cases have already resulted in settlements, including agreements involving TikTok and Snap before this trial began.
In a separate case, a New Mexico jury ordered Meta to pay $375 million after finding violations related to child safety protections. Executives including Mark Zuckerberg testified during the Los Angeles proceedings, while internal company documents were presented to jurors as evidence.
The outcome could influence hundreds of pending cases, as courts continue to examine whether platform design can be linked directly to harm.
What do you think about this ruling? Let us know in the comments.
